Disclosure of Medical Information

Information about a person’s health and health care is generally considered to be highly sensitive and personal. Therefore, this type of information enjoys statutory and common law protection in South Africa.

COMMON LAW PROTECTION

The common law right of privacy prevents public disclosure of private facts. Invasion of privacy is a tort / delict based in common law, allowing an aggrieved party to bring a lawsuit against an individual / institution who unlawfully intrudes into his/her private affairs, discloses his/her private information, publicises him/her in a false light, or appropriates his/her name for personal gain.

There is also common law duty to preserve professional confidence. The obligation of confidentiality goes beyond undertaking not to divulge confidential information; it includes a responsibility to make sure that all records containing patient information are kept securely.

STATUTORY AND OTHER PROTECTION

The National Health Act of 2003 makes it an offence to disclose patients’ information without their consent, except in certain circumstances.

The Health Professions Council of South Africa has also issued guidelines relating, inter alia, to the obligation to keep medical records confidential.

WHEN IS DISCLOSURE PERMITTED

Generally disclosure of confidential clinical material to someone other than the patient will be an actionable breach of confidence. There are, however, three circumstances when clinicians can release confidential clinical information without the consent of a patient:

  1. Disclosure is ordered by a court;
  2. Disclosure is required by law; and
  3. Disclosure is in the public interest.

Court orders

Civil and criminal courts have powers to make orders requiring a doctor or holder of health records to disclose confidential information for the purposes of litigation.Usually such orders are made following a third party having requested the information and the court having determined that there is an overriding public interest in the disclosure.

Legislation

The Road Accident Fund Act, for example, requires a victim of a motor vehicle to disclose certain medical information to the Road Accident Fund (“the Fund”), to successfully lodge a claim with the Fund. Failure to provide such information, allows the Fund to object to the validity of the claim.

A public interest in disclosure

As the duty of confidentiality is not absolute, there may be circumstances where the public interest in maintaining confidentiality is outweighed by the public interest in disclosing specific information. Such circumstances may include where disclosure is necessary to avert a real risk of a danger of death or serious harm to others or for the prevention or detection of serious crime. Even then such disclosure is permissible only if made to someone with a proper interest in receiving the information.

CONCLUSION

Although civil actions for breach of confidence are rare, the issue can be a minefield for the unwary. Thus, those who are about to reveal confidential information should carefully consider their grounds for doing so and be clear that there is either consent, lawful authority or some public interest justification.

View Related Blogs
View All
news

Contractual Liability Exclusion Must Be Assessed Against Each Cause of Action Separately, Not Applied Wholesale Where Multiple Claims Are Pleaded in One Action

In Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, reviewing the matter de novo, held that the lower court had erred ...

INSURANCEInsurance LawJean-Paul RuddLitigation
news

Know your Fund Rules: when can a Pension Fund be held liable for investment loss?

Factual exposition: Mr Carl Francois Conradie (“Mr Conradie”) had been employed from 01 January 1993 until he retired on 31 January 2022. During his employment, he belonged to his employer’s pen...

Commercial LitigationDispute ResolutionLabour LawLABOUR LAWLesetja MochakiLitigationMtho Maphumulo
news

Liability Insurer Has No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Where Property Damage Results From Insured’s Deliberate Placement of Demolition Debris: The Requirement of an “Accident” for Coverage

In Great West Casualty Co. v. VanFleet, the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois held that a commercial general liability (“CGL”) insurer owed no duty to defend or ind...

Dispute ResolutionINSURANCEInsurance LawJean-Paul RuddLitigation