ARIPO
ARIPO is one of the two regional IP organisations in Africa. It was established in 1976 with the signing of the Lusaka Agreement in Lusaka, Zambia on 9 December 1976. ARIPO’s objectives include the promotion, harmonisation and development of the intellectual property systems within the ARIPO member states. ARIPO came into effect in 1978 and originally had 16 founding states. Membership is open to members of the UN Economic Commission for Africa or the African Union. ARIPO currently has 22 member states. ARIPO has 4 working protocols dealing with different forms of intellectual property. The Harare Protocol which deals with Patents, Designs & Utility Models currently has 20 signatories and is the most used Protocol within the ARIPO ecosystem. The Banjul Protocol currently has 13 signatories and deals with Trade Marks. Other protocols are the Swakopmund Protocol which deals with Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Folklore and the Arusha Protocol which deals with Protection of New Varieties of Plants.
Applications filed at ARIPO are processed centrally by the ARIPO Office which is based in Harare, Zimbabwe. The ARIPO Office communicates with the designated states throughout the application and prosecution process and up until registration or grant takes place. At that stage, the IP right takes effect in the designated states and is subject to the national laws (provided that domestication has taken place). Validation steps are not typically required although there are some exceptions. When filing an application at ARIPO it is possible to select the states in which protection is desired. It is not necessary to designate all member states. It is only possible to designate states which are members of the relevant protocol. Below is a table showing the current membership information for each of the ARIPO Protocols.
Classification
The International Classification of Goods and Services under the Nice Agreement applies. According to the Regulations issued under the Protocol, goods and/or services belonging to several classes may be included in one and the same application. However, any designated state may declare that in such a case, the application shall result in two or more registrations. At present, only Botswana, Cape Verde, Gambia, Namibia, Lesotho, Liberia, Sao Tome & Principe and Swaziland allow multiple-class registrations.
An ARIPO registration in respect of services will not be enforceable in member states the national laws of which do not make provision for the protection of service marks; at present only Malawi does not recognise service marks.
Convention priority
An applicant of an application under the Banjul Protocol may claim a priority right under the Paris Convention on the basis of an earlier application filed in a Paris Convention member country not more than six months prior to the ARIPO application.
Examination/procedure
The application may be filed directly with the ARIPO office or with the trade mark office of a member state. The applicant must designate those states in which protection is required. The office where the application is lodged will examine the application as to formal requirements. If formalities are complied with, a filing date is accorded. If the application was filed in a contracting state, the office of such state must transmit the application to the ARIPO office without delay.
The ARIPO office notifies the trade marks office of each designated state of the filing, which office must examine the application in accordance with its national laws. A national office has 9 months to inform the ARIPO office that the registration will have no effect in its territory. The basis for such a rejection is that the application does not conform to national formalities, or that the mark cannot be registered due to its nature, i.e. does not comply with substantive requirements. If designated states do not communicate such objections within the 9 months period, the ARIPO office will accept the application and publish a notice of acceptance in the ARIPO Journal. In the absence of opposition (see the section on Opposition below), the ARIPO office will confirm the registration, whereupon the registration will have effect in the designated states.
If the ARIPO office refuses an application, the applicant has the option of requesting, within three months of the date of receipt of the refusal, that the application be treated as a national application in any designated state.
Opposition
The Protocol does not provide for oppositions to ARIPO trade mark applications. The Regulations provide that the conditions for the filing and registration of marks will be determined in contracting states by their domestic legislation. Opposition proceedings are therefore conducted in terms of the national laws of the relevant member country. It is relevant to note that the Protocol provides for the publication of a trade mark in the official ARIPO Journal to occur three times: the first publication occurs after filing the trade mark application, the second after acceptance and, finally, the third after registration.
The practical effect of this is that, in the period between the publication for the purposes of acceptance and the publication for the purposes of registration, an opposition period occurs. While the Protocol does not expressly provide for an opposition term, article 6bis:2 does state that three months after publication of acceptance, the ARIPO office shall register the mark on payment of registration fees. Effectively this means that, in the 3-month period before the publication for registration purposes occurs, a notice of opposition, setting out the grounds upon which the opposition is based, based on the national legislation in each of the relevant designated states, must be filed in each designated state, and at the ARIPO office.
Duration and renewal
A trade mark registration shall be for a period of ten years from the date of registration and may be renewed for like periods. The renewal is effected at the ARIPO office; a grace period of six months is provided for the late payment (with a surcharge) of a renewal fee.
The Lusaka Agreement and the ARIPO Protocols address only industrial property rights, despite the change by the Organisation of its name to refer to intellectual property. The ARIPO instruments contain no provisions dealing with copyright.
Accordingly, the national laws of the ARIPO member states will determine the position in regard to the protection of copyright.
48th Session of the ARIPO Administrative Council
Lesotho played host to this year’s annual Session of the ARIPO Administrative Council, which took place from 28 October 2024 to 1 November 2024. The Session was officially opened by the Minister of ...
December 10 2024
Arusha Protocol for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants comes into force
On 24 November 2024 the Arusha Protocol finally came into force, almost 10 years after it was first adopted in Arusha, Tanzania on 6 July 2015. The Protocol aims to create a harmonised system across c...
December 09 2024
ARIPO announces the launch of the ARIPO Intellectual Property journalist Award
ARIPO, in collaboration with the Intellectual Property Rights & Innovation (AfrIPI) Project, recently announced the launch of the ARIPO Intellectual Property Journalists Award competition. The pu...
October 15 2024
How can we help you?
We have offices in four major cities in South Africa: Pretoria, Johannesburg, Cape Town, and Durban. Additionally, we have 23 associate offices in the rest of Africa, the firm serves as a gateway into Africa for IP clients. Please contact your nearest office for any legal enquiry or assistance.