Mandatory mediation for all new High Court matters
As of 9 March 2020, parties are required to consider mediation for every new matter instituted in a High Court of South Africa. Non-compliance with this new rule, could result in a party receiving an ‘irregular step’ notice – which could significantly delay the finalisation of a matter, and lead to unnecessary costs.
Mediation typically is a voluntary process between parties to a dispute in which an impartial and independent mediator, assists the parties to either:
- resolve the dispute between them;
- identify and limit the issues in dispute;
- explore potential areas of compromise;
- generate options to resolve the dispute;
- clarify priorities by facilitating discussions between the parties; and
- assist in negotiations to resolve the dispute.
Every new action or application must include a notice in which the instituting party either agrees to a referral of the dispute to mediation, or opposes such a referral. The opposing party is also required to file a notice in which it indicates whether it agrees or opposes the referral of the dispute to mediation. If the referral to mediation is opposed by either party, reasons must be provided. The notice shall be ‘without prejudice’ (i.e. not filed with the registrar); however, a mediation notice may be disclosed to the Court when an order for costs is being considered.
The impact of the parties agreeing to refer the matter to mediation, is that the time limits for the filing of further affidavits or pleadings will be suspended. During the mediation process, the parties to the mediation have to comply with various requirements, including entering into an agreement to mediate, filing a minute recording the decision to mediate and filing a joint minute indicating whether a settlement was reached. The mediation has to be concluded in 30 days, unless extended by a judge. If any issue remains in dispute after the mediation, the parties may proceed to litigation.
Mediation has long been recognised by the Courts in South Africa as an alternative form of dispute resolution. There are many recognised benefits to mediation, including cost savings and a potential speedy resolution. However, for the first time this typically ‘voluntary’ process has become mandatory. Parties are required to declare that mediation was considered to resolve the dispute in order to comply with the Uniform Rules of Court.
Adams & Adams is available to assist parties in the mediation of any dispute; either by representing a party, preparing mediation agreements, or to act as an independent mediator. For this purpose, Adams & Adams has identified a panel of mediators who can assist with disputes in all practice areas, including:
- Commercial;
- Intellectual property law;
- Insolvency law;
- Employment and labour law;
- Family law;
- Property transactions; and
- Other litigation.
Contact us at mediation@adams.africa to assist you with any mediation or dispute resolution enquiry.

The Road Accident Fund’s exclusion of illegal foreigners
The Road Accident Fund has a statutory obligation in terms of section 17(1) of the Road Accident Fund Act to “ compensate any person (the third party) for any loss or damage which the third party ha...
December 10 2024

WAS THE DECISION BY THE NPA TO REMOVE COUNTERFEIT GOODS MATTERS FROM THE COMMERCIAL CRIMES COURT IN LINE WITH THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE AS SET OUT IN SECTION 34 OF THE CONSTITUTION?
South Africa is a constitutional democracy, which means that it is a country which observes human rights principles and is governed by the rule of law. All decisions taken by State organs must promote...
November 12 2024

Hard on crime, soft on sentencing: the dilemma of lenient sentences imposed in South Africa
We see it weekly in the news, “South African National Anti-Counterfeit Task force seizes counterfeit goods worth R100 million rand, suspects arrested”. But what happens to these suspects arrested ...
October 25 2024