Anti-Dissipation Interdicts in Counterfeit Goods Cases
Author: Godfrey Budeli
There is nothing more frustrating to a trade mark proprietor than going through the effort of securing a judgment in a counterfeit goods case, only for the defendant to use every trick in the book to frustrate the collection of the judgment debt.
Often these delaying tactics have one reason and one reason only – to provide the defendant time to conceal, dissipate or secrete all of his funds or diminish the value of his assets so that there is nothing left to attach.
Fortunately, it is possible in our law to obtain an anti-dissipation interdict to freeze the defendants’ funds and assets pending the outcome of the litigation. This remedy derives its name from the case of Knox D’arcy Ltd & Others v Jamieson & Others and can be brough by way of an interlocutory application at any time during the action procedures to secure the plaintiff’s claim against the defendant. An application of this nature takes the form of an interim interdict and brought on an ex parte basis.
A court will grant an anti-dissipation interdict where there is evidence that the defendant is concealing, dissipating or secreting funds or diminishing the value of the assets with mala fidei intentions of defeating a plaintiff’s claim. If the plaintiff is successful, the anti-dissipation interdict will secure the funds or assets upon which the plaintiff can levy execution. The objective of such an interdict is essentially to prevent the plaintiff from being stuck with a hollow judgment debt.
We recently assisted a client to successfully secure an anti-dissipation interdict in litigation relating to the counterfeiting of the clients’ famous skin care product. The defendant in question was also involved in money laundering and was hiding funds in several bank accounts of corporations either linked directly, or indirectly, to him.
We successfully demonstrated that the defendant was engaging in well-designed scheme in bad faith with the sole intention of frustrating the execution process. The Court consequently granted the order freezing all of the defendant’s personal and business bank accounts, pending the outcome of the litigation.
Therefore, anti-dissipation interdict has proved to be a powerful tool in counterfeit goods cases to ensure the successful execution of the judgment debt.
Godfrey Budeli
South Africa further strengthens its position as production base for global commercial exploitation of new plant varieties
Plant breeders’ rights remain central in securing investment in local production capacity South Africa has opened a new export market for locally produced cherries. On 8 September 2026, South Africa...
September 30 2026
When Brands Get Patriotic
Use of the South African flag in your trade mark and products The South African flag, with its unique design and vibrant colours, is more than just a national symbol. It evokes a deep sense of pride, ...
September 28 2026
Contextual Interpretation of Policy Exclusions: Court Confirms that a Broadly Worded Property Exclusion Does Not Extend to Copyright Infringement
In Nichole Sliney Realty Team, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company, Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted a motion for judgmen...
September 21 2026