Jean-Paul Rudd
No Second Bite at Arbitration: The Force of Public-Sector JBCC Substitutions
Construction adjudication is often treated as interim, with arbitration or litigation waiting as the final forum. In a judgement delivered by the Eastern Cape Division, Makhanda on 30 April 2026, Krüger AJ warned that this assumption is only as good as the contract: adjudication is as provisional, revisable, or arbitral as the agreement provides. Where […]
May 19, 2026
Security for Costs in Full Court Appeals: A Practitioner’s Guide After Koopman v Minister of Police
Practitioners appearing in full court appeals have long worked on the assumption that Rule 49(13) of the Uniform Rules applies whenever an appeal is directed to the full court of a division of the High Court – regardless of who granted leave. That assumption has now been tested and found wanting. In Koopman v Minister […]
April 24, 2026
Lessons from Court: A Practical Guide for Private Bodies Responding to PAIA Requests
Private bodies – such as hospitals, medical practices, banks and everyday employers – regularly receive requests for access to information under the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 (“PAIA”). Many recipients assume they have no choice but to comply with every request placed before them. That assumption is wrong. A recent High […]
April 13, 2026
The Freak Accident Defence: How Foreseeability Can Defeat an Infrastructure Claim
Claims for damages arising from injuries on public infrastructure are a regular feature of South African litigation. What is frequently underestimated, however, is the demanding role that foreseeability plays in limiting such claims. A recent High Court judgement from the Western Cape Division, delivered on 10 March 2026 per Janisch AJ, provides a sobering illustration […]
March 23, 2026
When Can an Estate Agent Be Held Liable for Latent Defects in Immovable Property?
Claims against estate agents for latent defects discovered after the purchase of immovable property are frequently pursued without a full appreciation of the legal requirements that must be satisfied for success. One requirement in particular is often overlooked: the estate agent’s duty of disclosure extends only to material facts within their personal knowledge, and there […]
March 12, 2026
When Is Emotional Distress Sufficient to Ground a Claim for Damages?
Claims for damages arising from emotional shock are often pursued without a full appreciation of the legal requirements that must be satisfied for success. One requirement in particular is frequently overlooked: the plaintiff must prove, through expert psychiatric evidence, that they have suffered a detectable psychiatric injury as opposed to mere emotional distress. The recent […]
March 9, 2026
When Does a Business Rescue Practitioner Become Personally Liable for a Company’s Debts?
In the realm of business rescue, where financially distressed companies are given an opportunity for rehabilitation, a critical question arises: when does the conduct of a business rescue practitioner cross the threshold from mere error or misjudgement into personal liability for the company’s debts? The recent Supreme Court of Appeal judgement in Africa Agriculture and […]
February 26, 2026
Can a Professional Evade Accountability by Cancelling Their Registration?
In an age where professional accountability is paramount to public protection, a pressing question emerges: can a registered professional escape disciplinary proceedings simply by cancelling their registration? The recent case of Pienaar v Engineering Council of South Africa and Others provides a definitive answer to this question, examining the interplay between voluntary deregistration and ongoing […]
February 24, 2026
Who may challenge an FSCA decision? Practical lessons on locus standi from Banxso case
Can shareholders, directors, or key persons step into the ring when the regulator strikes at a company — or has the Tribunal finally closed that door? A recent decision of the Financial Services Tribunal raises a pointed question for regulated entities and individuals alike: who, in law, is entitled to approach the Tribunal to challenge […]
February 10, 2026|
D&O: U.S. Court Enforces Prior‑Notice Exclusion for Meaningfully Linked Circumstances
The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware has recently held that a prior notice exclusion barred cover for securities and derivative actions that were meaningfully linked to circumstances disclosed years earlier in a letter to the insured’s audit committee. The court concluded the later suits “arose out of” the same alleged accounting improprieties […]
December 4, 2025
Biometrics and CGL Exclusions: U.S. Court Finds No Cover for Facial‑Recognition Claims Under “Access or Disclosure” Clause
A U.S. district court in Illinois has recently held that a commercial general liability policy’s “access or disclosure of confidential or personal information” exclusion defeated cover for a class action alleging the retention and use of facial‑recognition data. The court concluded that biometric information derived from facial geometry falls within “confidential or personal information”, and […]
November 26, 2025
U.S. Court Applies “Interrelated Wrongful Acts” and Client‑Services Limits to Defeat PI Claim
A U.S. federal court, applying California law, has recently held that a financial services firm had no cover under its professional liability policy for a client’s claim because the alleged misconduct was part of a single, interrelated course of conduct that began before the policy incepted. The court also found, independently, that cover failed because […]
November 19, 2025
Late Means Late: U.S. Court Affirms Coverage Bar for Untimely Notice Under Claims‑Made Policy
The Eleventh Circuit has confirmed that an insured’s failure to give prompt notice of a pollution condition—despite reporting within the policy period—can defeat coverage under a claims‑made policy where the insured cannot overcome the presumption of prejudice to the insurer under the law of the state in which the dispute arose. In many other US […]
November 17, 2025
Jurisdiction drawn at the line: Tribunal confirms limits of the Pension Funds Authority
A recent decision of the Financial Services Tribunal underscores a crucial distinction in pension law — the jurisdictional boundary between approved and unapproved benefits. The ruling confirms that the Pension Funds Adjudicator (PFA) has no authority to investigate complaints arising from employer-held, unapproved disability policies, even when such benefits are linked to a registered fund. […]
October 21, 2025|
No Pay, No Indemnity: Assignment-Only Settlement Does Not Trigger Coverage
In ISMIE Mutual Insurance Co. v. Pergament, an Illinois appellate court reaffirmed a core principle of professional liability insurance: indemnity is not triggered unless the insured becomes legally obligated to pay damages. The court held that where a doctor assigned his policy rights to a claimant but was expressly relieved of any payment obligation, the […]
October 15, 2025
Mind the Wording: No Coverage Without a Clear Demand — Lessons for Claims Teams
A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, in the matter between Del Mar Woods v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co., 2025 WL 1798300 (S.D. Cal. June 27, 2025), provides guidance on the interpretation of “Claim” under claims-made insurance policies and highlights the limits of what may constitute a […]
September 2, 2025
Estoppel Without Words: A Cross-Border Lesson for South African Insurers
A recent decision from the Appellate Court of Illinois, in the matter between Monroy-Perez v. Sentry Select Insurance Co., 2025 IL App (1st) 241711, serves as a stark warning to insurers regarding the consequences of withholding policy information from insureds. The court held that an insurer may be estopped from raising coverage defences, including limitations […]
August 26, 2025
Policy Wording Matters: US Electromagnetic Field Ruling Offers Cautionary Tale for South Africa
A recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in the matter between Hammond Power Solutions Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. (2025), provides important guidance on the interpretation of exclusions in commercial general liability (CGL) policies—particularly those relating to radiation. The ruling confirms that a broadly worded exclusion […]
August 19, 2025
Procedural Fairness in Debarment Proceedings: Lessons from G Van Zyl v Kobie Spangenberg en Genote (Pty) Ltd
The recent decision in Gideon Pieter van Zyl v Kobie Spangenberg en Genote (Pty) Ltd by the Financial Services Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) highlights the critical importance of compliance with the procedural safeguards under section 14 of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 37 of 2002 (“FAIS Act”) when effecting a debarment. The case underscores […]
August 19, 2025|
Not Every Regulatory Knock Is a Claim: US D&O Lessons for South African Boards
Directors’ and officers’ liability (D&O) insurance is a critical risk management tool for companies and their leadership, providing protection against claims arising from alleged wrongful acts in the management of the company. However, the scope of coverage under such policies is often the subject of dispute, particularly when regulatory investigations are involved. A recent decision […]
August 12, 2025
US Court Denies Fire Loss Claim Due to Noncompliance with “Duties After Loss” Provision
A recent judgement by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut offers important guidance for both policyholders and insurers on the significance of adhering to post-loss obligations under an insurance policy. Factual Background In this matter, the insured acquired a residential property and arranged property insurance. Shortly after the policy commenced, the […]
July 3, 2025
Georgia Federal Court Upholds Insurer’s Reliance on Pollution Exclusion for Chemical Leak Fatality
A Georgia-based contractor specialising in cooling system installations was sued after a maintenance worker died from exposure to leaking refrigerant gas at a facility where the contractor had installed the cooling system. The worker’s family pursued a wrongful death claim against the contractor, who in turn sought indemnity from its liability insurers. The insurers refused […]
June 26, 2025
US Court Holds Email Notice of Intent to File Third-Party Joinder Constitutes a “Claim” When Sent, Not When Read, Under Claims-Made Policy
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has recently held that a letter notifying the insured of the sender’s intent to institute a third-party joinder against it constituted a Claim under the insured’s claims-made professional liability insurance policy. Factual Background and Policy Context The insured healthcare staffing agency provided staff to […]
June 18, 2025
Defending Under a Reservation of Rights: Practical Insights for Insurers from the US
A recent decision from the Southern District of New York offers valuable perspective on the procedures and obligations that arise when an insurer defends a claim under a reservation of rights. Background The case involved a professional negligence action against an attorney, following an alleged failure to sue all responsible parties in a prior medical […]
June 12, 2025
London High Court Decision Highlights Broker Duties and the Reach of “Other Insurance” Clauses
A recent High Court judgement in London has sent a strong message to insurance brokers about the consequences of failing to provide comprehensive advice, while also offering new guidance on how overlapping insurance policies interact. The case, involving a leading insurance broker and a community housing trust (“the trust”), is likely to have a lasting […]
June 4, 2025
Who’s Covered to Drive? The Hidden Risks in Car Insurance
Car insurance policies are often assumed to provide blanket protection for any incident involving the insured vehicle. Many policyholders overlook how their insurer defines who else may legally and validly drive the insured vehicle. These definitions — and their often-overlooked nuances — can have major consequences when a claim arises. The recent US case of […]
May 30, 2025
Preserving the Status Quo in Pension Fund Disputes: Insights from Cadac Pension Fund and Others v Nash and Others
Introduction The recent High Court judgement in Cadac Pension Fund and Others v Nash and Others (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, 16 April 2025) offers important guidance on the role of interim interdicts in pension fund disputes — particularly where issues of curatorship, member entitlements, and alleged fund mismanagement are concerned. The case deals with a pension […]
May 2, 2025|
Running into Liability: The Legal Duty of Care in Running Events
Introduction South Africa boasts a vibrant running culture, with a wide array of organised races held throughout the year. The organisation of these events varies significantly; some races ensure that runners are shielded from spectators and the public, while others allow for potential interaction between runners and the public. The recent Supreme Court of Appeal […]
April 1, 2025
The Unseen Shield: Foreseeability of Damages in Delictual Claims
Introduction In the realm of delictual claims, the concept of foreseeability of damages is both fundamental and frequently underestimated. Plaintiffs often focus on the harm suffered and the apparent negligence of the defendant, but delictual liability requires a more nuanced assessment—particularly of whether the harm was reasonably foreseeable. Foreseeability plays a pivotal role in evaluating […]
March 25, 2025
Bridging the Liability Gap: Employer Recourse Against Subcontractors in Construction Contracts
In the construction industry, it is common to encounter a principal building contract between the employer and the main contractor, alongside a subcontract between the main contractor and its subcontractor. A pertinent question arises: does the employer have any recourse against the subcontractor if the employer is held liable for the actions of the subcontractor, […]
March 18, 2025
Ticking Coverage Bomb: The Cost of Delayed Notice in Claims-Made Policies
Claims-made policies often require that policyholders notify their insurer promptly or as soon as practicably possible after an incident that may give rise to a claim. This requirement exists primarily to allow insurers to investigate potential claims while evidence is still fresh. Prompt notice helps ensure that key details and documentation are secured, which is […]
March 5, 2025
The Consequences of Failing to Pay Pension Fund Contributions
Pension fund contributions are not discretionary payments; they are statutory obligations. Employers who fail to comply with these requirements not only prejudice their employees but also risk significant legal consequences. This principle was recently reinforced in Engineering Industries Pension Fund & Metal Industries Provident Fund v Installair (Pty) Ltd & Others. The Issue at Hand […]
February 27, 2025|
Is Surveillance Permissible in an Increasingly Privacy-Conscious World?
In an era where privacy concerns are at the forefront of legal and societal discourse, the question arises: is the surveillance of individuals permissible? The recent case of De Jager v Netcare Limited provides a compelling examination of this issue, balancing the right to privacy against the public interest in discovering the truth. This article […]
February 26, 2025
Hidden Perils Under the Surface of Building Insurance
The primary purpose of building insurance is to protect property owners from financial losses due to damage to their buildings. Buildings can be damaged from a variety of events, including fires, storms, floods, and earthquakes, each posing unique risks and challenges. Exclusions and Their Impacts Policyholders and brokers acting on their behalf must apprise themselves […]
February 10, 2025
The Fine Print in Claims-Made Policies: When a Claim Is Not a Claim
The interpretation of what constitutes a claim under a claims-made policy is often a contentious issue. Ambiguities in policy wording frequently lead to disagreements between policyholders and insurers over whether specific events or circumstances trigger coverage. Frequently, policyholders fail to understand what qualifies as a claim under their policy. This misunderstanding often results in insurers […]
January 21, 2025
Exclusion Clauses in Claims-Made Policies: What Insurers Need to Know
Claims-made policies in professional indemnity insurance often include prior exclusion clauses, which serve to limit the insurer’s liability for claims arising from circumstances that occurred or were known before the policy’s inception date. Insurers should exercise care in drafting prior exclusion clauses to ensure clarity and precision. Ambiguities in these clauses can lead to disputes […]
January 13, 2025
Lessons from the U.S.: Claims-Made Policies and the Importance of Objective Policy Terms Over Subjective Beliefs or Assurances
Can a professional services firm rely on a client’s assurance that they will not pursue legal action to avoid notifying its claims-made professional liability insurer of a potential claim arising from an alleged omission? This question is particularly significant in the context of claims-made professional liability insurance, where the insured’s duty to disclose any potential […]
January 7, 2025
Policy Limits vs. Property Damage: Lessons from Hurricane Ian
Disputes often arise between insurers and policyholders regarding the value of insured property. Some of these disputes are resolved with little difficulty, as the value can be relatively easily established. For example, in cases where a storm causes partial damage to a home and its contents, the insured property remains assessable. However, other disputes are […]
November 1, 2024
But-For Test in Action: Uncovering the Contractual Liability Exclusion in D&O Policies
Directors and Officers (D&O) insurance policies often exclude claims arising from actual or alleged contractual liability. These exclusions typically prevent coverage when the company or an insured person is sued for breaching a contract or failing to fulfil contractual obligations. This is because D&O policies are designed to cover wrongful acts related to executive actions […]
October 9, 2024
Little Wiggle Room: The Power of Payment Certificates in Construction Contracts
The High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, was recently called upon to decide on a claim based on interim payment certificates from a building contract between the applicant, a construction company, and the respondent, a shopping centre. Under the building contract, the applicant was contracted to build a shopping centre in Montana, Pretoria. […]
August 30, 2024
Restraint of Trade Clauses: Balancing Employees’ Rights to Work versus Employers’ Proprietary Interests
Once regarded as unlawful for being against public policy and therefore unenforceable, restraint of trade clauses are now a common feature in employment contracts. The High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, was recently called upon to enforce a restraint of trade agreement between the applicant and the first respondent, its erstwhile employee, as […]
August 15, 2024
Third-Party Notices: Navigating the Fine Line Between Contractual and Delictual Liability
Often, more than one Defendant is sued for damages that a Plaintiff has sustained, whether jointly or in the alternative. Uniform Rule 13 allows a Defendant to issue a third-party notice against another Defendant where the former believes it is, in law, entitled to a contribution or indemnification from the latter. This scenario unfolded in […]
August 12, 2024
Debarments: A Symptom of Deeper Cultural Issues in the Financial Services Sector
Dishonest conduct by representatives of financial service providers (“FSPs”) continues to plague the sector. This is evident from an analysis of the most recent rulings of the Financial Services Tribunal, where a substantial proportion of the rulings pertain to reconsideration applications, challenging FSPs’ decisions to debar their former representatives. Are these simply the actions of […]
June 11, 2024
In-Person Commissioning: An Outdated Inconvenience Awaiting Parliamentary Intervention
In today’s fast-paced digital world, legislation often struggles to keep up with the rapid advancements in technology. An example of such legislation is the Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths Act, 16 of 1963 (“the Act”). The Act requires that oaths be administered in the presence of a commissioner of oaths. Is this […]
June 4, 2024
Legal Battle Over Towed Vehicle Ends in Favour of Insurer
A judgment from the High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Division, Mthatha, serves as a timely reminder that a lien (right of retention) can be defeated by providing adequate security for the debt alleged to be due. On 7 March 2023, the insured was involved in a collision on the road between Port St […]
June 3, 2024
Failure to Know or Follow the Rules of Court: A Civil Procedure Pitfall for Legal Practitioners
A judgment from the High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Division, Bisho, serves as a timely reminder for legal practitioners to diligently consult the rules of court before instituting proceedings to avoid the pitfalls that may arise from failing to follow a rule correctly. The applicant sued the first and second respondents, seeking damages […]
May 13, 2024
A Simple Yet Fatal Restraint of Trade Pitfall for Employers
Restraint of trade agreements safeguard businesses by legally preventing employees from joining competitors, thus protecting businesses’ proprietary information and maintaining their competitive advantage. In an urgent application seeking to enforce a restraint of trade agreement, recently before the Labour Court of South Africa, Johannesburg, an insurance brokerage firm made the fatal error of failing to […]
April 19, 2024
The Double-Edged Sword of “Without Prejudice” Offers
A judgment stemming from the High Court of South Africa, Limpopo Division, Polokwane serves as a timely reminder that a “without prejudice” offer, if not drafted or approached properly, can interrupt the prescription of a claim. Facts of the case The plaintiff instituted action against the defendant for the injuries she suffered from a helicopter […]
April 11, 2024
Judicial Reminder: The Ethical Obligation and Fiduciary Duty of Plaintiff Attorneys to Discourage Baseless Legal Actions
Attorneys representing plaintiffs should take note of a judgement recently handed down in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg. Two unemployed plaintiffs instituted action against the Minister of Police, Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, and the National Director of Public Prosecutions, each claiming R5,000,000.00 for their alleged unlawful arrest and malicious […]
April 8, 2024
When Time Runs Out: A Court’s Take on the Timely Assessment of Insurance Claims
Policyholders and insurers alike should take note of a judgement recently handed down in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg. The case concerned a claim for specific performance in terms of a life insurance policy. The policyholder lodged a claim with his insurer through its authorised agent on or about 27 September […]
April 2, 2024
Are Midstream Reviews of Proceedings at an Investigative Stage Permissible? Insights from a Full Bench Appeal
An appeal serving before a full bench in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria has recently shed light on whether a midstream review of proceedings conducted at an investigative stage is permissible. The appeal stemmed from a ruling by a single judge in the same division that an investigation conducted at the […]
February 19, 2024
In the Spotlight: JSE Censure Decision Under Scrutiny
On 5 September 2023, a noteworthy legal judgement emerged from the Gauteng Division of the High Court of South Africa, situated in Johannesburg. The case centered around an individual sanctioned by the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (“JSE”) for transgressing various provisions of the JSE’s Listing Requirements. Aggrieved by the sanction imposed, the individual applied, under section […]
September 6, 2023
The Ticking Clock of Justice: Understanding Prescription in Medical Malpractice Claims
Prescription refers to the extinguishment of a legal claim or the loss of a right to take legal action due to the passage of time. The purpose behind prescription is to promote legal certainty, avoid stale claims, and provide a fair and just resolution to disputes. Prescription periods are set out in various laws and […]
August 8, 2023
Navigating Risks and Seizing Opportunities: The Transition to a Green Economy
The global business community is undergoing a transition towards a green economy driven by a shared recognition of the urgent need to address climate change, protect natural resources, and promote sustainable development. As businesses in South Africa and elsewhere adopt sustainable practices and environmentally conscious strategies, they can expect to encounter two categories of risks […]
July 4, 2023
The Tshela Health Care Case: Challenging the Notion of Immunity for Principals in Medical Malpractice Cases
It is trite law that a principal cannot be held civilly liable for the wrongs committed by an independent contractor unless the principal is personally at fault. The legal position is less clear when the independence of an alleged independent contractor is called into question, as is often the case with medical malpractice cases involving […]
June 12, 2023
Court Upholds Exceptions: Auditor and Compliance Officer Cleared in Lawsuit Instituted Against Intermediary and Statutory Officers.
A few years ago, several well-known short-term insurance companies took legal action against an intermediary company due to the damages they incurred as a result of the intermediary’s collapse. The intermediary, presently in liquidation, was responsible for the collecting and accounting of premiums owed to the insurers. Surprisingly or some might even contend strangely, the […]
May 17, 2023
Insurance and Compliance: The Importance of Certificates of Compliance for Solar Systems and Inverters in South Africa
Insurance policies often contain a standard clause requiring policyholders to comply with the laws of the country where the policy is issued. The intention behind the clause is to ensure that policyholders act in a lawful manner. Failure to comply may lead to policy exclusions or the denial of claims. With the current energy crisis […]
May 17, 2023
The Cybersecurity Challenge: How Businesses Can Safeguard Themselves Against the Evolving Threats of Cybercrime.
Businesses across the spectrum are increasingly making use of the services of technology to manage their operations more efficiently. Unfortunately, this has led to a significant rise in cybercrime which is regarded by many as the fastest growing criminal activity around the world. Types of cyber threats The cyber threats faced by businesses are continuously […]
April 11, 2023
Shield Yourself: The Vital Role of Professional Indemnity Insurance in Today’s Litigious Landscape
Litigation in South Africa has risen tremendously over the years with more and more individuals and organizations seeking redress through our courts. The increase in litigation can largely be ascribed to: Improved access to justice through initiatives, such as the Small Claims Court, Legal Aid South Africa, and the various industry Ombuds. Consumer friendly legislation, […]
March 16, 2023
NON-DISCLOSURE: A CALL ON THE LEGISLATURE TO COME TO THE AID OF POLICYHOLDERS.
Non-disclosures by policyholders are rife within the long-term insurance industry. A non-disclosure can be committed fraudulently, innocently, or negligently. In any respect, the non-disclosure needs to have been material and must have induced an insurer into entering a contract of insurance to warrant the contract being avoided (cancelled). The test for materiality is an objective […]
March 7, 2023
Policyholders who fail to perform regular maintenance risk their insurance claims being rejected Author JP Rudd
Insurance policies often contain clauses requiring policyholders to take reasonable steps to maintain an insured object. The reason therefore is quite simple – the purpose of insurance is to protect policyholders against unforeseen events, not to compensate them for wear, and tear. A policyholder’s failure to maintain an insured object may result in any claim […]
February 23, 2023
Ombud holds insurer liable to pay on equitable grounds
The Ombudsman for Short Term insurance has ruled that an adventure resort’s insurer is liable to indemnify it against a claim brought by one of its patrons. On 19 January 2019, a patron sustained severe burns when hot oil from one of the resort’s quad bikes spilled onto the patron’s legs. The patron immediately demanded […]
February 15, 2023
Insurer held liable to pay farm owner millions in damages following fire outbreak
During May 2015, a fire broke out on farm owned by Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd (“Normandien”), causing extensive damage to a plantation which was insured by Safire Crop Protection Co-operative Limited (“Safire”). Normandien subsequently lodged a claim with Safire who in turn rejected the claim. The reason for their rejection was twofold; firstly, Safire believed […]
February 9, 2023
CASE UPDATE: Medical practitioner receives disability payment worth millions despite falling behind on insurance premiums.
Our client, a successful medical practitioner, suffered a cardiac arrest (“the event”) following a routine procedure to remove a mass from his kidney. Pursuant to the event, our client was placed on a ventilator for months, resulting in him not being able to speak post being weaned off the ventilator. In addition, our client suffered […]
February 2, 2023
Claiming consequential loss from your insurer
Many insured consumers may be in for a nasty surprise for wrongly believing that they enjoy blanket cover from their insurer. The reality is however that their cover is limited to that specifically agreed with their insurer. The cover usually relates only to physical damage sustained to an insured object, meaning that, unless otherwise agreed, […]
January 30, 2023
INSURER FAILS IN ITS BID TO SET ASIDE ORDER GRANTED IN ITS ABSENTIA
A large insurance company’s application to rescind a court order, granted by default, was dismissed with costs in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria. The insurer, in exchange for monthly premiums to be paid by the insured, agreed to indemnify the insured for loss or damage. The insured’s motor vehicle was subsequently […]
January 25, 2023
The Devil is in the details of an Insurance contract
A few media houses have recently reported that Mr. Erlo Goshai, a Cape Town motorist, has warned motorists to “read the fine print when entering into contracts with their insurance company to make sure they are adequately covered”. According to the reports, Goshai was driving along Marine Drive and was in the process of turning […]
January 19, 2023
Negligence vs Recklessness
Consumers procure insurance for many reasons. One of the reasons is to protect themselves from their own actions. Negligence v recklessness Some actions enjoy cover under insurance policies whilst others don’t. For example, negligent actions are usually covered whilst reckless actions are usually not. Negligence can colloquially be defined as failing to act reasonably which […]
January 17, 2023
Has your insurance claim been rejected? Your broker may just be liable
Thousands of consumers make use of the services of a broker, to procure insurance from an insurance company. In such instances, two separate agreements come into existence.[1]The first is between the consumer and the broker and the second is between the consumer and the insurance company (represented by the broker). While both agreements involve the […]
October 24, 2022
A Practical Rundown of why Terms and Conditions in Insurance Policies Matter
Insurance provides cover for losses arising from insured events which may happen in the future. Against an agreed premium, the risk of an insured event arising is transferred from the insured to the insurer. In practice, insured events triggering insurance policies to respond are not always clear-cut. This is largely due to the complex wording […]
March 31, 2022
Who Is Liable for a Dog Bite Injury
Dog bites incidents are a frequent occurrence in society. Sadly, many people have been bitten by dogs roaming around freely outside or whilst visiting a premises. Who is liable for the injuries sustained from a dog bite or from other domesticated animals? ACTIO DE PAUPERIE For liability (to succeed with an action) under the actio […]
November 8, 2021
Business Insurance Repudiation – Free Consultation
The events of the past two years, from the COVID-19 pandemic to the recent riots, have underlined the critical importance of business insurance. Unfortunately, there are no guarantees that your business insurance claim will be settled and not repudiated. Although an insurer has the right to protect its interests when handling your insurance claim, your […]
August 12, 2021|
Who Will Foot the Bill for COVID-19 Vaccine Complications?
The wait is finally over! South Africa’s vaccination roll-out plan is expected to go into overdrive shortly. However, in recent weeks it has been widely reported in the media that people have experienced severe side-effects, ranging from allergic reactions to blood clots, after receiving Covid-19 vaccines. Legal Position Elsewhere But who is to blame if […]
April 20, 2021|
Careful! An Unreasonable Exception Can Cost You Dearly
When it comes to personal injury litigation, one of the most common tactics used by defendants is to attempt to delay the process through exceptions which are increasingly ill founded. Let us face it: most of the doctors and hospitals sued for personal injury claims are insured. These insurance companies are civil litigation veterans. They […]
December 4, 2020|
Rugby League star’s family to receive compensation following his wrongful death in hospital
The High Court in Pretoria has ruled that Gauteng’s current Health MEC, Dr Gwen Ramokgopa, must pay for all damages sustained as a result of a local rugby league player’s death at the Steve Biko Hospital.
May 10, 2019
Botched medical procedure? Here’s what to do.
Unfortunately incidents where it can be shown that medical professionals have neglected their legal obligation and are negligent are becoming commonplace. So what steps should you take if you, or a loved one, find yourself in a similar position?
November 29, 2018

