The Return of the Advisory Opinion
After a long period of uncertainty relating to advisory opinions by the Competition Commission, a new regulation has been published by the Department of Trade and Industry which reintroduces non-binding Advisory Opinions.
An advisory opinion is a written opinion by the Commission that provides the Commission’s interpretation of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998, applied to a certain set of facts or agreements. An advisory opinion intends to assist parties to interpret the Competition Act, and to provide stakeholders with a better understanding of compliance requirements. The Commission’s advisory opinions, however, are non-binding and therefore do not offer legal protection against enforcement action if the conduct is later found to contravene the Competition Act.
Although advisory opinions can deal with a variety of aspects, they typically focus on transactions, agreements or practices. For example, the Commission could be approached with the terms of an agreement and be asked to advise whether it constitutes a notifiable merger or not. Stakeholders may also approach the Commission regarding whether a certain practice contravenes the Competition Act. Parties, however, should be mindful that they do not enjoy the same potential protections as they would under the Commission’s whistleblowing policy (the Corporate Leniency Policy). It is therefore recommended that parties seek legal advice prior to making disclosures to the Commission regarding potential contraventions of the Competition Act.
Previously, the cost of an advisory opinion was R2 500. The fee to now request an advisory opinion has increased significantly. The cost of requesting an advisory opinion is R24 000 for medium enterprises and R60 000 for other firms. The fee may be waived (at the Commission’s discretion) for certain entities, such as constitutional institutions, municipalities, trade unions, political parties etc.
Whilst advisory opinions can be of assistance to parties, the fact that they are non-binding means that they provide only limited comfort, especially in relation to complicated questions of law. The risk of non-compliance with the prescripts of the Competition Act (which attracts significant administrative penalties and potential criminal liability) will remain with the parties, notwithstanding a positive advisory opinion. Parties are therefore encouraged to seek legal advice to pro-actively ensure compliance with the Competition Act.
Frozen Accounts and Fraudulent Funds: Navigating the Rights of Banks, Customers and SARS
A recent judgment of the High Court has affirmed the right of a bank to freeze a customer’s account without prior notice where it reasonably suspects that the account has received the proceeds o...
September 30 2026
The Reckless Trading Risk: What D&O Insurers Should Know About Director Liability
Introduction A September 2026 High Court judgment has reaffirmed and applied the statutory framework for holding company directors personally liable for reckless trading and conduct calculated to defr...
September 21 2026
Know your Fund Rules: when can a Pension Fund be held liable for investment loss?
Factual exposition: Mr Carl Francois Conradie (“Mr Conradie”) had been employed from 01 January 1993 until he retired on 31 January 2022. During his employment, he belonged to his employer’s pen...
September 09 2026

