National Shutdown events and business insurance matters

The National Shutdown of 20 March 2023 saw many businesses and institutions close down in fear of violence and destruction to their properties. To the contrary (credit being due to the protestors and overwhelming visibility of law enforcement) this was not the case. Whilst the anticipated damage was less than expected, it is nonetheless apt to consider the legalities associated with events such as national shutdown, strikes and protests in so far as they relate to business insurance.

Insurance claims linked to events such as protests, strikes, and national shutdowns fall within the ambit of SASRIA cover. Many will remember discussions around SASRIA cover in relation to the 2021 July Unrest events. Therefore, for a business or institution to claim in terms of a policy, that particular business will need to have a SASRIA cover extension in its short-term policy. It is worth noting that one cannot take out cover for SASRIA independently – it has to be an extension to an existing short-term insurance policy. Furthermore, given the frequency of the not-so-peaceful protests and strikes in our country, it is sagacious and imperative that businesses and individuals alike take out SASRIA cover as an extension to their short-term policies. Fortunately, SASRIA extension is offered at a reasonably lower premium.

The affected business will need to report the incident to the police and submit a claim with their insurer. In turn, their insurer will submit a claim with SASRIA. If the insured business does not have SASRIA cover, it will obviously not enjoy any protection and the owners will bear the losses themselves. If, however, there is a SASRIA cover in place, an insured business will have to demonstrate to the insurer through evidence that the damage suffered is linked to the events of a National Shutdown. Failure to demonstrate this may have undesirable repercussions for the claim, as it may be rejected. It may, for example, end up being a claim for theft against a short-term insurer – not against SASRIA. The reality is that nothing prevents a “normal” theft incident during a National Shutdown. This possibility is heightened by the fact that acts of violence and disruptive behaviour were almost non-existent – unlike with the 2021 July Unrest. If an insured business enjoys both SASRIA cover and theft cover, it should be able to claim successfully, as any dispute as to whether it was an isolated theft incident or incident linked to a National Shutdown will be between the 2(TWO) insurers. This may prolong finalisation of a claim for the insured but, ultimately, the insured should be indemnified either by their short-term insurer or SASRIA.

Insured businesses whose premises may have been vandalised during the National Shutdown need to promptly report this to the police, their broker and/or insurer. In cases where they are unsatisfied with the outcome of their claims, whether due to the claim being repudiated or their pay out being unsatisfactory, they should seek legal advice and challenge the insurer’s decision.

|
Mtho Maphumulo
Senior Associate | Litigation Attorney
View Related Blogs
View All
news

Contractual Liability Exclusion Must Be Assessed Against Each Cause of Action Separately, Not Applied Wholesale Where Multiple Claims Are Pleaded in One Action

In Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, reviewing the matter de novo, held that the lower court had erred ...

INSURANCEInsurance LawJean-Paul RuddLitigation
news

Know your Fund Rules: when can a Pension Fund be held liable for investment loss?

Factual exposition: Mr Carl Francois Conradie (“Mr Conradie”) had been employed from 01 January 1993 until he retired on 31 January 2022. During his employment, he belonged to his employer’s pen...

Commercial LitigationDispute ResolutionLabour LawLABOUR LAWLesetja MochakiLitigationMtho Maphumulo
news

Liability Insurer Has No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Where Property Damage Results From Insured’s Deliberate Placement of Demolition Debris: The Requirement of an “Accident” for Coverage

In Great West Casualty Co. v. VanFleet, the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois held that a commercial general liability (“CGL”) insurer owed no duty to defend or ind...

Dispute ResolutionINSURANCEInsurance LawJean-Paul RuddLitigation