US COVERAGE DISPUTE: SIXTH CIRCUIT FINDS PRIOR KNOWLEDGE FATAL TO CLAIMS-MADE INSURANCE POLICY

Brief background

The insured applied for a claims-made professional liability policy and answered “No” to a question asking whether it was aware of any circumstances that might result in a claim. Prior to the application, the insured had received multiple complaints from a customer regarding defective equipment and had internally acknowledged the issues. The insurer denied coverage when a lawsuit was later filed, citing the prior-knowledge exclusion in the policy.

Issue for determination

The court was called upon to decide whether an insured was entitled to coverage under a professional liability insurance policy despite having prior knowledge of circumstances that could reasonably give rise to a claim.

Discussion

The policy contained a prior-knowledge exclusion, which barred coverage for any claim arising from circumstances known to the insured before the policy’s inception that could reasonably be expected to result in a claim. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favour of the insurer, holding that the insured’s prior knowledge of the dispute precluded coverage.

Court’s reasoning

The court applied Michigan law, which enforces the plain language of insurance contracts. It found that the insured had actual knowledge of the potential claim before the policy was issued. The exclusion was clear and unambiguous, and the insurer was entitled to rely on the insured’s representations in the application. The insured’s attempt to characterise the issue as a minor dispute or the fault of a third party was rejected.

Conclusion

Disclosure obligations during the insurance application process are critical; failure to disclose known risks can void coverage. Courts will enforce prior-knowledge exclusions strictly, especially in claims-made policies. Insureds must carefully assess whether any known circumstances could reasonably lead to a claim and disclose them accordingly.

|
Mtho Maphumulo
Senior Associate | Litigation Attorney
View Related Blogs
View All
news

Contractual Liability Exclusion Must Be Assessed Against Each Cause of Action Separately, Not Applied Wholesale Where Multiple Claims Are Pleaded in One Action

In Las Vegas Sands, LLC v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, reviewing the matter de novo, held that the lower court had erred ...

INSURANCEInsurance LawJean-Paul RuddLitigation
news

Know your Fund Rules: when can a Pension Fund be held liable for investment loss?

Factual exposition: Mr Carl Francois Conradie (“Mr Conradie”) had been employed from 01 January 1993 until he retired on 31 January 2022. During his employment, he belonged to his employer’s pen...

Commercial LitigationDispute ResolutionLabour LawLABOUR LAWLesetja MochakiLitigationMtho Maphumulo
news

Liability Insurer Has No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Where Property Damage Results From Insured’s Deliberate Placement of Demolition Debris: The Requirement of an “Accident” for Coverage

In Great West Casualty Co. v. VanFleet, the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois held that a commercial general liability (“CGL”) insurer owed no duty to defend or ind...

Dispute ResolutionINSURANCEInsurance LawJean-Paul RuddLitigation