A Smashing Tale of Two Burgers

The well-known RocoMamas restaurant chain has taken Rack ‘n Grill, a small food truck business in Cape Town, to task about the infringement of its registered trade mark SMASHBURGER. Rack ‘n Grill, in their menu, has a burger called the “Smash Burger”. RocoMamas recently sent a letter to the owner of Rack ‘n Grill, demanding that it removes the “Smash Burger” name from their menu and all other advertising material within 48 hours.  In the press Rack ‘n Grill said that it did not understand  the demand,  as RocoMamas’ registration certificate revealed that the registered mark was spelt as one word, while Rack ‘n Grill was using two words.  The “burger” portion of the mark was disclaimed, meaning that RocoMamas cannot claim exclusive rights in the word burger – which makes sense.

Unfortunately for Rack ‘n Grill, its use is still is a problem. Here’s why…

The Trade Marks Act states that use of a confusingly similar mark for the same or similar goods, without the permission of the brand owner, may cause confusion amongst the public and will be an infringement.  The fact that the registered mark is one word and the version used by Rack ‘n Grill on its menu was spelt as two words, makes no difference.

Despite its registered mark, the dispute was apparently amicably resolved. Sometimes it seems you can have your burger and eat it!vc_column_textWritten by:

Mkhuseli Methula – Candidate Attorney

View Related Blogs
View All
news

There’s no smoke without combustibles

Following the adoption of the motion of desirability in June this year, the Portfolio Committee on Health commenced its section-by-section deliberations on the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery...

Advertising LawIntellectual PropertyKim RampersadhNicole Haworth​Regulatory LawTrade Marks
news

Respecting the Lens, Part 2: Why "I Didn't Know I Needed Permission" Is Not a Copyright Defence

Last year, in our article Respecting the Lens: Copyright Infringement and the Rights of Photographers in South Africa, we addressed a common misconception encountered in copyright enforcement matters:...

CopyrightDaniëlle van DeventerDarren OlivierIntellectual PropertyLita Miti-QamataMandla NgidiMaureen Kiugu (née Makoko)
news

The Trade Mark That Refused to Die: Deadwood or Zombie?

The Case of Altron Ltd v Tracker (Pty) Ltd Pretoria High Court, 2026 A trade mark unused for almost ten years might ordinarily be destined for removal. Yet in Altron v Tracker, residual reputation hel...

Amina SulimanBrandingIntellectual PropertyTrade Marks