A Smashing Tale of Two Burgers
The well-known RocoMamas restaurant chain has taken Rack ‘n Grill, a small food truck business in Cape Town, to task about the infringement of its registered trade mark SMASHBURGER. Rack ‘n Grill, in their menu, has a burger called the “Smash Burger”. RocoMamas recently sent a letter to the owner of Rack ‘n Grill, demanding that it removes the “Smash Burger” name from their menu and all other advertising material within 48 hours. In the press Rack ‘n Grill said that it did not understand the demand, as RocoMamas’ registration certificate revealed that the registered mark was spelt as one word, while Rack ‘n Grill was using two words. The “burger” portion of the mark was disclaimed, meaning that RocoMamas cannot claim exclusive rights in the word burger – which makes sense.
Unfortunately for Rack ‘n Grill, its use is still is a problem. Here’s why…
The Trade Marks Act states that use of a confusingly similar mark for the same or similar goods, without the permission of the brand owner, may cause confusion amongst the public and will be an infringement. The fact that the registered mark is one word and the version used by Rack ‘n Grill on its menu was spelt as two words, makes no difference.
Despite its registered mark, the dispute was apparently amicably resolved. Sometimes it seems you can have your burger and eat it!vc_column_textWritten by:
Mkhuseli Methula – Candidate Attorney
South Africa further strengthens its position as production base for global commercial exploitation of new plant varieties
Plant breeders’ rights remain central in securing investment in local production capacity South Africa has opened a new export market for locally produced cherries. On 8 September 2026, South Africa...
September 30 2026
When Brands Get Patriotic
Use of the South African flag in your trade mark and products The South African flag, with its unique design and vibrant colours, is more than just a national symbol. It evokes a deep sense of pride, ...
September 28 2026
Contextual Interpretation of Policy Exclusions: Court Confirms that a Broadly Worded Property Exclusion Does Not Extend to Copyright Infringement
In Nichole Sliney Realty Team, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Company, Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted a motion for judgmen...
September 21 2026