The Tiff over Teff | Traditional Knowledge

Recently, Mr Fitsum Arega, the Ethiopian Ambassador to the United States of America, tweeted news that the Court of The Hague had just handed down judgment in a matter in which two Dutch patents, concerning the processing of Teff, had been held to be invalid for lack of inventive step. His tweet continued “I hope we can learn from this that our national assets must be protected by Ethiopians & friends of #Ethiopia”.

Teff is a nutrient rich gluten-free grain that is and has for a long time been an integral part of Ethiopia’s heritage. It is used to make Injera, a pancake-like flatbread, which is a staple part of the Ethiopian diet.

The Dutch patents were in the name of a company owned by Dutch businessmen who, according to various media reports, had received traditional knowledge relating to Teff from Ethiopia in terms of an agreement in terms of which the traditional knowledge would be exploited for the mutual benefit of both parties. The businessmen, however, were not party to the agreement in their personal capacities but via a company which subsequently went insolvent resulting in their contractual obligations to Ethiopia with respect to the traditional knowledge ceasing. The businessmen then assigned the patents into the name of another entity and were able to exploit them free of any contractual obligations towards Ethiopia.

In South Africa, the Protection, Promotion, Development and Management of Indigenous Knowledge Systems Bill is currently before the National Assembly waiting for final approvals before being enacted into law. An aim of the Bill is to protect South African traditional knowledge to avoid situations like this one where traditional knowledge is exploited by third parties for no benefit to South Africa and without legal recourse.

For assistance and information regarding Traditional Knowledge policies in Africa, contact AfricaIP@Adams.Africa.

Sophia Smallbones
Senior Associate | Patent Attorney
View Related Blogs
View All
news

There’s no smoke without combustibles

Following the adoption of the motion of desirability in June this year, the Portfolio Committee on Health commenced its section-by-section deliberations on the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery...

Advertising LawIntellectual PropertyKim RampersadhNicole Haworth​Regulatory LawTrade Marks
news

Respecting the Lens, Part 2: Why "I Didn't Know I Needed Permission" Is Not a Copyright Defence

Last year, in our article Respecting the Lens: Copyright Infringement and the Rights of Photographers in South Africa, we addressed a common misconception encountered in copyright enforcement matters:...

CopyrightDaniëlle van DeventerDarren OlivierIntellectual PropertyLita Miti-QamataMandla NgidiMaureen Kiugu (née Makoko)
news

The Trade Mark That Refused to Die: Deadwood or Zombie?

The Case of Altron Ltd v Tracker (Pty) Ltd Pretoria High Court, 2026 A trade mark unused for almost ten years might ordinarily be destined for removal. Yet in Altron v Tracker, residual reputation hel...

Amina SulimanBrandingIntellectual PropertyTrade Marks